Nguồn: ở đây
Hưởng ứng lời kêu gọi của chương trình “Người đương thời”
sáng nay trên VTV1, mỗi công dân Việt Nam phải có nghĩa vụ tuyên truyền chủ
quyền biển đảo, chỉ rõ cho thế giới bên ngoài thấy sự chính nghĩa của mình,
hành vi đặt giàn khoan của TQ trong thềm lục địa Việt Nam là sai trái. TBS nghĩ
là Facebook là 1 công cụ tốt, với 2 tỷ người đang sử dụng. Và Tây Tàu gì cũng
vậy, ngồi trên tàu điện, xe hơi, sân bay, nhà ga…đều say sưa coi facebook.
Trong khi TQ không sử dụng FB, nên mình có thể tận dụng lợi thế này để có được
sự ủng hộ của dư luận quốc tế. Của 2 tỷ FBers và gia đình bạn bè của họ. Một
con số khổng lồ nếu chúng ta khai thác tốt.
Tony
đã đọc bài viết dưới đây. Của một nhà báo làm việc tại tờ South China Morning
Post ( Bưu Điện Hoa Nam BS), để ý kiến khách quan hơn. Các bạn có thể cắt và
dán bài dưới đây trong FB của mình. Sau đó thì coi trong friend list của mình,
cứ ai là Tây hay dấu hiệu là Tây thì xin phép share lên tường FB của họ. Bạn
Tây đó sẽ có trăm ngàn friend, cũng toàn Tây, họ sẽ đọc và share cho nhau nữa.
Nhân
tiện, bạn nào giỏi các ngoại ngữ khác như Hoa, Nhật, Hàn, Pháp, Nga, Ả Rập, Tây
Ban Nha, Indonesia, Ý, Đức….cũng nhờ dịch giùm và gửi lại TBS. TBS sẽ đăng cho
bạn có thể chia sẻ cho các bạn trên khắp thế giới. Share hết lên tường của Li
Cu Sứt, Bắc Chung He, Ôm Chảo Bay Ra Biển, Natapong, Loksky, Osawa, Vladimir gì
đó hết nhé….
Nghĩa
vụ công dân thể hiện lúc này đây các bạn à. Trung Quốc đang lên 1 chiến dịch
truyền thông lớn để “ cả vú lấp miệng em”, chúng ta nên có sự quyết tâm và làm
việc có ý nghĩa, 1 người hãy là 1 chiến sĩ truyền thông với thế giới bên ngoài.
Cám ơn các bạn. TBS
-----------------------------------------------------
China's current behaviour vis-à-vis its South China Sea neighbours is
aggressive, arrogant and smacks of Han chauvinism and ethnocentrism. Far from
being an expression of national pride, it is giving patriotism a bad name.
Patriotic Hongkongers should recognise it for what it is: a dangerous ploy.
Not
only has Beijing bared expansionist teeth to Vietnam and the Philippines, it
has now succeeded in shifting Indonesia from a position of trying to act as a moderator
between China and the other South China Sea states to opponent. Twice in recent
months, Indonesia has accused China of claiming part of its Natuna island
archipelago. So much for a "peaceful rise" when you rile neighbours
with populations of more than 400 million, who you assume to be weak.
All
China's sea claims are wrapped up in that nine-dash line which extends more
than 1,000 nautical miles from the coasts of Guangdong and Hainan to close to
Borneo, the island shared by Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei, and includes
almost all the sea between Vietnam and the Philippines. This claim encompasses
more than 90 per cent of the sea, even though China (including Taiwan) has only
about 20 per cent of the coastline.
All this on the basis of claims to history that conveniently ignore the very
existence of other peoples and their histories of seafaring and trading going
back 2,000 years, and pre-dating China's ventures in the south sea and beyond.
Indonesians got to Africa and colonised Madagascar more than 500 years before
Zheng He. In turn, the peoples of Southeast Asia absorbed more from India and
the Islamic world than China.
In
the case of the current issue with Vietnam, brought about by China's movement
of a drillship into waters due east of Danang, China has a small case, in that
it does now own the Paracel Islands, which are closer to the drill location
than to Vietnam. But the islands themselves have long been in dispute between
the two, a matter settled for now by China's unprovoked invasion of them in
1974.
But
as they have never had permanent settlement, they make a very weak case for
enjoying a 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone compared with Vietnam.
History also tells us that this coast was the heart of the Cham mercantile
state, which for 1,000 years was the leading player in regional trade.
There should surely anyway be a case for compromise between China and Vietnam.
Malaysia and Thailand managed one over a gas-rich area between them in the Gulf
of Thailand. Other regional states - Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia - have put
island ownership issues to the International Court of Justice and accepted the
result. But China remains unwilling either to compromise or submit to
arbitration. Meanwhile, joint development is impossible because China makes it
conditional on acceptance of its sovereignty.
In
the case of shoals off the Philippines, China's case rests on a mix of invented
history and the fact that it filed claims first, a poor basis given that it had
no continuous presence there and the Philippines initially inherited a treaty
between two Western colonial powers. These shoals and other features claimed by
China are so obviously within the Philippine exclusive economic zone and in
waters long sailed by the peoples of that country that there should be no
argument.
Scarborough
Shoal is about 200km from Luzon, 650km from China. The claim to Half Moon Shoal
is even more outrageous. That is the reef where the Philippines arrested
Chinese fishermen allegedly with a catch of giant turtles, a protected species.
Knee-jerk protests have erupted from Beijing. The reef is 110km from Palawan,
nearly 1,500km from China.
The
fact that the absurd claims go back to the Kuomintang era is neither here nor
there. Nor is the fact that previous states may have occasionally paid tribute
to Beijing. For these trading states, tribute was a tax, the cost of doing
business with China, which did not imply Chinese sovereignty. And if China
occasionally acted as an imperial power in the region, that is surely cause for
concern, not a basis for overlordship of a predominantly Malay sea. Otherwise,
Turkey could claim Egypt and the Russians all of central Asia.
A
revived China wants to flex its muscles and show who is boss in the region -
just as it tried with Vietnam in 1979 - and remind the US of its own weakness.
But there is also a basic reluctance to treat the non-Han neighbours as equals,
people with their own history and cultures which, except for Vietnam, have
never been subject to major Chinese influence.
China's
history of assuming superiority, most especially over those with darker skins,
is long. Belief in eugenics and the need to protect and enhance Han genetic
characteristics was strong in the Republican era and found echoes in the
opinions and social policies of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew. It has long been
rejected in the West and was condemned under Mao Zedong . But it has been
making a comeback on the mainland, where some academics find it hard to accept
that modern man spread out of Africa and that China is thus not a separate and
unique source of mankind.
Nếu độc giả không biết
tiếng Anh thì có thể đọc bài trên quahttp://dantri.com.vn/su-kien/hanh-dong-cua-trung-quoc-mang-hoi-huong-chu-nghia-sovanh-dai-han-879576.htm
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét